Build Your Own Jarvis

Video card · Luke Pierce · open in Notion ↗

Needs scriptingpublishes 2026-09-15

Tasks on this video — 2

Luke Pierce — Thumbnail + A/B test: Build Your Own JarvisTalan Viewzdue 09-10Ready to start

Luke Pierce — Write script (Build Your Own Jarvis)unassigneddue 08-29Ready to start

Properties

StatusNeeds scripting

Client TagLuke Pierce

Publish date2026-09-15

Voicenote Cutoff2026-08-31

Filming Cutoff2026-09-02

Filming Booked—

Batch2026-08-24

EditorFarhan Alam Pushon

Editing Due Date—

Prep status—

Prep Date—

Footage—

MethodOutlier scan

Priority1

Score190

Top outlier285k views, 17x

Brand fitHigh

Client accessLuke Pierce, Esrajul Haq, Farhan Alam Pushon

Everything else42 properties — formulas, runner bookkeeping, raw relations›

Bugged Blake todayno

Chased editor todayno

Client3b4f1179…

Client Checked In Todayno

Client NameLuke Pierce

Client needs to do the thingno

Client owes—

Client statusOnboarded - paying

ClientKeyLuke Pierce

Date—

Days to edit13

Due this week—

Edit Version—

Editing Checkno

Editing Late?⚠️ ASK FOR EDITING DUE DATE

Editing Reference—

Editor owes—

Film due in1

Film status—

Flagged to Nate todayno

FunnelTop

Intro Due Date—

Intro Editor—

Page body

Research2.2k chars›

Proof top-up still needed on this card. The Velio daily quota ran out part way through this rebuild, so the captions below carry only the fields that were genuinely captured on the earlier pull: multiplier, exact title, channel, views and publish date. Subscriber count, channel average and the @handle are missing and have not been guessed. Two things to fix on the next Velio pass: fill those three fields, and find two more proofs sharing the title 1 skeleton, because title 1 currently stands on one video and the rule is three. Until that is done, title 1 is the strongest of the three but it is not fully proven.

Two proofs that were on this card before have been removed. The AI Workshop Iron Man video used a banned word in its published title, so it cannot sit on a Luke card. The Proton video shares no skeleton with any of the three titles, it was category colour rather than proof.

Proves title 1: "How To Make A Jarvis"

43x · How To Make A Jarvis · Jared Rhod · 152,193 views · Published Jul 7 2026

youtube.com/watch?v=cQqOkx5qnWo

The highest multiplier on the card off the shortest title on the card. Four words, no tool named, no promise. That is the whole skeleton and it is why title 1 barely changes it.

Proves title 3: "[Tool]: Zero to Personal AI Assistant (1 Hour Course)"

3.4x · Hermes Agent: Zero to Personal AI Assistant (1 Hour Course) · Nate Herk · 348,757 views · Published May 10 2026

youtube.com/watch?v=gb5TlGw6Uks

Proves title 2: "How I Turned [Tool] Into My Personal Assistant (Full Guide)"

17x · How I Turned Claude Into My Personal Assistant (Full Guide) · AI Edge · 284,942 views · Published May 14 2026

youtube.com/watch?v=CvLkhGWZlvE

Every proof on this card builds an assistant for one person and one inbox. Not one of them builds the assistant that knows a company's pipeline, its margins and its open jobs. That gap is the reason this idea is worth Luke's time rather than being a rerun.

Concept1.1k chars›

Luke builds the assistant that knows his own business, on camera, in X steps, and then puts it on the spot with live questions at the end.

For each step, he covers:

•Which of his own systems he plugs in here, and what that system holds that a stock assistant has no way of seeing

•What this step cost to add, one off or monthly, at the tier he is actually paying for

•The question it can answer after this step that it could not answer before, asked out loud

•What it got wrong the first time he asked, and whether he fixed it or decided to live with it

•Who else in his business is allowed to ask it things, and what he had to lock down before he let them

•The step he built first, threw away, and rebuilt in a different order

The ending reframes it: he asks it the questions it still cannot answer, then says which of those he would not want it answering anyway. The point is not a machine that runs the business, it is that he stops being the only person who knows the numbers.

Production: desk sit down with the screen mirrored, one continuous build, then a live question round to camera at the end. No set build needed.