Women’s Delusion

Video card · no client · open in Notion ↗

Postedpublishes 2026-08-13

Properties

StatusPosted

Client Tag—

Publish date2026-08-13

Voicenote Cutoff—

Filming Cutoff2026-07-21

Filming Booked—

Batch—

Editormarie tonie

Editing Due Date2026-08-13

Prep status—

Prep Date—

Footagehttps://www.dropbox.com/scl/fo/9a7ipr2bhd41sjg1oo868/ACgCinAugL7wUQ3aBpDXKJA?rlkey=1k7avsnvaijijpow2btwq6fkm&st=3gdr81qp&dl=0

Method—

Priority—

Score—

Top outlier—

Brand fit—

Client accessKait Willett, Maverick Willett, marie tonie , Areej Naveed Naveed Iqbal

Everything else42 properties — formulas, runner bookkeeping, raw relations›

Bugged Blake todayno

Chased editor todayno

Client360f1179…

Client Checked In Todayno

Client NameKait Willett

Client needs to do the thingno

Client owes—

Client statusOnboarded - paying

ClientKeyKait Willett

Date—

Days to edit23

Due this week—

Edit Version2

Editing Checkyes

Editing Late?🚨 LATE!!! 🚨

Editing Reference—

Editor owes—

Film due in-41

Film status—

Flagged to Nate todayno

Funnel—

Intro Due Date—

Intro Editor—

Intro status—

Last Notified Due Date2026-08-13

Latest Edit

Page body

Research10.3k chars›

Concept2.6k chars›

Kait breaks down the 7-10 standards modern women treat as reasonable but data proves are delusional, and what each one is actually selecting for.

Kait shares the credibility frame up front (e.g. the percentage of men who actually meet the stacked criteria, pulled from census or dating-app data, so the audience knows this is measured, not opinion).

For each standard, Kait shares:

•The specific expectation, stated plainly the way women phrase it (6 feet, six figures, etc.)

•The actual percent of men who clear it

•The psychological reason the standard feels reasonable from the inside.

•What the standard is really filtering for versus what she thinks it filters for.

•Who it removes from her options and what she is left with.

•How the stacking works: each standard is defensible alone, but combined they describe a fraction of a percent of men, a math most women never run.

Titles + Thumbnails5.4k chars›

repackage ?

•Women's Standards Have Become Delusional

•The Delusion Behind Modern Women's Standards

•0.1% of Men Meet Women's Standards

•1/700

•The Man 98% of Women Want Doesn't Exist

Other:

•You Won’t Believe What Women Expect From Men Now

Description0.6k chars›

[CTA / LINK]

Six feet, six figures, and a list that keeps growing. I break down the delusion behind modern women's standards, run the actual numbers on how many men clear each expectation, and explain the psychology that makes every requirement feel reasonable from the inside.

For each standard I show what it is really filtering for versus what women think it filters for, and who it quietly removes from the dating pool.

Each standard is defensible alone, but stacked together they describe a fraction of a percent of men. Most women never run that math, and I run it for them.