Nate Curtiss

in CRM since Apr 2026

no package size · no billing period

Active videos

Scheduled in period

Delivered this mo.

Delivered all-time

Open slots

Undated

Owes now

Findings

Billing period not set — slots cannot generate until it rolls

Config gaps: no voicenote cadence, no package size (Videos)

Calendar — this client, rolling week

Owes right now — 2

recordingNate Curtiss + Jenny Hoyos Full Courseno date

recordingHiggsfield Courseno date

Schedule health — 2 findings

No editor1 College Dropout vs 10 Haters (White Room)Needs hook + structure2026-09-18

No publish dateHiggsfield CourseNeeds recording—

Upcoming — 3 active

2026-09-181 College Dropout vs 10 Haters (White Room)no editorNeeds hook + structure

script (8.5k chars)

1 College Dropout vs 10 Haters (White Room)

Cut from B cam, A_0007C205H260828_053602CL_CANON.MP4. It has the room audio, A cam does not. B cam runs 37 seconds ahead of A cam. Every timecode below is B cam.

# Hook

No voiceover. Cut entirely from tape. Montage first, then the intro take lands it. Whole hook is 45 seconds max, montage plus intro.

Montage. 32 seconds hard cap. Nine clips, fast, no air between them. Trim each to the punch. He opens and closes, and every shot from the room gets answered on the next cut.

Attribution warning. The transcripts have no speaker labels and merge turns inside a single cue. Confirm every THEM clip against picture before locking.

1.HIM — 00:38:48 – 00:39:02, 5s. "Who in this room has ever cheated on an assignment in college?" Jump cut over the silence straight to "everybody cheats." Best line on the tape, it just cannot have the full run-up in a montage.

1.HIM — 00:05:38 – 00:05:43, 4s. "Why do you need forty K a year to learn how to make a Google slide?"

1.THEM — 00:05:47 – 00:06:01, 6s. Her answer to it, straight back: "Would you rather go to somebody that can make a little YouTube video who's maybe 15 years old, or somebody that's making over 100K a year, literally at the university for a reason?" Runs directly off 2, that is the real exchange on the tape.

1.THEM — 01:05:03 – 01:05:06, 3s. Her: "Are you going to tell me that I'm working harder than you are?"

1.HIM — 01:05:06 – 01:05:10, 3s. "No. I'm working way harder." Cuts straight off 4, never separate them.

1.HIM — 00:32:28 – 00:32:31, 3s. "Do you really think a D on a piece of paper is going to teach you anything?"

Delivered — 0 all-time

Nothing posted yet.

Setup

Scripts byViewz

Voicenote cadence—

Filming rhythm—

CRM statusOur content

Open in Notion CRM ↗Money → Finances

THEM — 00:32:31 – 00:32:35, 3s. Her, straight back: "Yeah, it teaches me real quick."

1.HIM — 00:41:11 – 00:41:17, 5s. "Go to the bar Friday. Go to the bar Saturday. Go to the frat Wednesday. I did this, by the way. It taught me nothing." Different point in the tape from 6 and 7, cut in here as the answer. It is his real position on the same claim, stated in full at 00:40:55: "making a mistake in college will not teach you anything." Use the longer version if the shorter one lands flat.

1.HIM — 00:21:12 – 00:21:24, 6s. "What do you think everybody's doing tonight? You think they're locked in studying, getting ready for their class? No. They're going to the bar." End on "bar." Do not carry the days of the week after it, none of that reads on its own.

Then the intro take. 00:02:33 – 00:02:46. "I'm Nate Curtis. I'm a college dropout. I quit school to pursue my dream of doing social media full time one year ago. And today we're back at my old college to debate 10 college students." Fourth and final take, the only one where he says Nate and looks down the lens. Do not use an earlier take. Cut on "students," before the "bang."

Straight into the rules.

Note: the title normally has to be confirmed in the first line. Here the montage runs first and the intro take does that job on the back end, which is deliberate.

The story: he goes back to defend leaving. The room's real argument is that it is not repeatable. He ends on the fact that one of them already did it and quit. That is the TikTok live girl, and she is why the video ends where it does.

Two biggest room moments go in the first eight minutes. Texture alternates instead of stacking four argument rounds at the front.

1.00:02:49 – 00:03:20 The rules. Trim to the shortest version that makes the mechanic clear.

1.00:17:52 – 00:23:40 Degree hands, hospitality kid, bar nights. One run, do not split. Biggest and most visual move on the tape, so it opens.

1.00:38:48 – 00:39:20 Everybody cheats. Loudest room reaction, pulled from minute thirty to minute eight.

1.00:04:25 – 00:07:37 College is worth the money. First one-on-one round.

1.00:11:20 – 00:13:57 A degree is insurance. Ends on his answer. Her tag at 00:14:01 is a closing line on a point already answered, so it is out.

1.00:34:35 – 00:37:56 Origin story. Cut for the choice and the risk, not the outcome.

1.00:40:16 – 00:41:56 What it cost him. Short, sits right after the monologue.

1.00:24:50 – 00:27:59 College is a simulation.

1.00:43:12 – 00:50:15 The college experience. Only comedy block, and he concedes inside it.

1.01:04:04 – 01:10:47 Going viral is luck. Hardest hit he takes, absorbed here instead of closing the video.

1.01:10:47 – 01:14:14 Luck is not real. The loop pays at 01:13:21.

1.00:53:00 – 01:03:48 The TikTok live math. The ending. She tried the exact thing he argues for, made two grand a week for three months, quit for finance. End the video on 01:03:44, "I'm calling you a very skilled person, you're not realizing it." Do not end on the number at 00:59:29.

1.01:14:14 – 01:14:25 Wrap.

Seed her early. She does not speak until 00:53:00. Use cutaways of her from the first twenty minutes so she is not a new face at minute thirty-five.

Keep the losses. The hospitality kid, the college experience concession, and her shot at his numbers. The format dies if he answers everything.

Two checks before locking. People get flagged out and come back, so every reorder junction needs a look at who is in frame on both sides. And he announces prompts on camera, so most of those lines now name the wrong prompt and get replaced by the graphic.

•00:00:00 – 00:04:25 slate and setup.

•00:08:28 – 00:10:38 the warehouse interruption.

•00:14:12 – 00:14:57 two prompts that died. "Dropping out is lazy" (nobody disagreed) and "most degrees are useless" (skipped).

•00:29:01 – 00:29:22 the "now he posts and gets twenty views" hit. No answer and no recovery attached. The same argument is made better and answered in block 11.

•00:33:17 – 00:34:35, 00:41:56 – 00:43:12, 00:50:15 – 00:50:39 prompt resets.

•Blake, both appearances.

•00:22:03 – 00:22:10 a debater holds him up as proof college works.

•00:38:19 – 00:38:44 he says he feeds his syllabus to an AI and has it do his coursework.

•Both, not just the first. The casting rule is that nobody in the room works in content, and keeping only the half where he helps is the part an audience would object to if they found out who he is. Nothing is lost, the raise of hands at 00:38:44 stands alone.

# Lily Vowell removals

Neither line is in either transcript. The ASR dropped both. This has to be done by ear.

What to listen for: a student answering back when he says "be around ambitious people," along the lines of "was being around Lily Vowell ambitious?" And separately a remark about sleeping with her friend.

Candidate window, 00:29:45 – 00:30:09. He is mid-sentence on "if you want to be around ambitious people, build skills, and" when something cuts across him. He loses the thread, says "what was the third one here?", then "I'm sorry," then restarts the identical sentence at 00:30:04. Both cameras show the derail, neither transcribed the cause. If it is there, cut from the interruption to 00:30:04 and pick up on the restart, which is word for word the same line so the join is invisible.

No candidate for the second. Sweep the gaps where the ASR gave up: 00:09:27 – 00:10:38, 00:33:17 – 00:33:39, 00:44:00 – 00:45:50, 00:50:15 – 00:50:40, 01:14:19 – 01:15:23.

No version ships with her name or a line that points at her or the friend. Ambiguous lines go to Nate with a timecode.

Pull these as selects before assembling. If run time has to come down, take it out of the connective material between rounds, never out of these.

•00:02:33 the intro take

•00:38:48 everybody cheats

•00:34:35 – 00:37:56 the origin story, unbroken

•00:53:00 – 01:03:48 the TikTok live sequence

•00:21:11 the bar nights

•00:05:37 the Google slide

•00:06:40 – 00:07:20 "these professors are teaching for a living"

•00:13:07 his mom got laid off

•00:11:33 – 00:12:45 the teacher layoffs

•00:17:52 – 00:19:43 the degree hands

•00:25:35 the real world consequence

•00:32:28 "a D on a piece of paper"

•01:06:00 – 01:09:00 the sales funnel breakdown

Tier 3, the ones that make him human

•00:16:28 the student concedes the school system is flawed

•00:19:43 – 00:21:11 the hospitality kid

•00:40:16 – 00:41:56 what it cost him

•00:45:50 – 00:46:40 the college experience concession

•00:43:12 – 00:44:50 ski club, squirrel watching club

•01:13:21 "what are these companies names"

Shorts, cut first: 00:38:48, 00:21:11, 00:05:37, 00:32:28, 00:17:52, 01:05:00

undatedNate Curtiss + Jenny Hoyos Full Courseno editorNeeds to film hook

script (2.6k chars)

# Hook

Nate: This is how to grow a YouTube channel from absolute zero to 100,000 subscribers in the next 12 months.

Nate: I'm Nate, and I get over 100 million views a year on YouTube for top business owners and personal brands.

Jenny: And I'm Jenny Hoyos. I get close to a billion views a year on my own channel, and between us we have helped thousands of creators and business owners grow theirs.

Nate: The reason 99% of channels never grow is that they are focused on the wrong things, and they have no idea what YouTube actually wants in 2026.

Jenny: This system works because it does the opposite of what almost everyone will tell you to do.

Nate: It uses long videos to build an audience that actually trusts you, and it uses shorts to put you in front of millions of people who have never heard of you.

Jenny: We are giving you every step, from picking your niche and building a brand nobody can copy, all the way down to how your videos get edited and posted.

Nate: Let's get into it.

# Concept

Nate and Jenny Hoyos co-teach a one hour course on taking a channel from zero to 100,000 subscribers using long videos and shorts together. Sections in the order they were filmed:

•Picking a niche, and separating the niche from the brand

•Coming up with ideas for both long videos and shorts

•Packaging: titles, thumbnails, and the first frame of a short

•Hooks, and the four part hook framework

•Writing scripts and sub hooks

•Filming and removing friction

•Editing

•Posting, cadence, and reposting everywhere

# Titles

•How to Grow a YouTube Channel From 0 to 100K Subscribers

•How to Grow a YouTube Channel From Absolute Zero (Full Course)

•0 to 100K Subscribers in 12 Months (Full Course)

# Description

[CTA / LINK]

I'm teaming up with Jenny Hoyos for a full course on growing a YouTube channel from zero to 100,000 subscribers in the next 12 months. Between the two of us we're pulling in over a billion views a year, and I'm walking through why most channels never grow and what YouTube actually wants in 2026.

We're covering picking a niche and separating it from your brand, coming up with ideas for long videos and shorts together, packaging your titles, thumbnails, and the first frame of every short, and building hooks with the four part framework we both use.

I'm also breaking down writing scripts and sub hooks, filming without friction, editing, and posting cadence so your videos get reposted everywhere. This is the full system, from the first idea to the moment it goes live.

undatedHiggsfield Courseno editorNeeds recording

script (1.9k chars)

Sponsored integration: Claude Fable 5 + Higgsfield MCP. Full course video, 7 steps. Script and course outline pages below.

[page: Higgsfield Course]

Thumbnail